Mark - Why should Jews not give Jerusalem? - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Mark Lincoln
    • 25.03.10 | 03:23 (IST)

    I think if historical precident is the determining factor then the Jews had better give Jerusalem back to the Canaanites from whom they took it. This would also include all Canaanite areas as described in Numbers 34:2. Clearly the Canaanites have historic precidence as evidenced by Eblaite records. There are also Sumarian records that show the region was occupied by Canaanites long before Moses. Ergo, the ultimate owners of the land are the descendents of the Canaanites which the Jews hold were not Jews, but people speaking another Western Semitic language, which Arabic is. Ergo, Israel - by historic argument - belongs to the Palestinnians. I do not accept that argument. I hold that Israel was the product of a civil war in the Palestinian Mandate which needs NO OTHER HISTORIC JUSTIFICATION. Israel exists. It is it's own argument. Israel is a fact created in 1948 by the survival of dedicated people in dire circumstances, and needs no other justification for existence.

    from the article: Two meetings, but no agreement between Obama and Netanyahu
    First published 17:00 24.03.10 | Last updated 11:09 31.03.10
Haaretz Headlines
Members of right-wing organization Lehava protesting.

Shin Bet: No basis to ban anti-Arab group

Defense minister hoped to outlaw Lahava organization, but Shin Bet finds no legal grounds to do so.

An Emirati F-16 at an air base in Jordan, Tues., Feb. 10, 2015.

Israel objected to arms sale to Gulf - U.S. official

Objection was voiced to Secretary of Defense Carter during his Israel visit last week; official says U.S. does not see Iran as part of the solution in the Middle East.

A candlelight vigil in Jerusalem for Shira Banki after her death was announced Aug. 2, 2015.

Time for the left to be more inclusive

Excluding potential allies like Naftali Bennett is a cardinal error in the struggle for LGBT rights in Israel.

Damage to a north London synagogue earlier this year.

Britain's CST: How grown-ups look at anti-Semitism

A new Community Security Trust survey on incidents involving U.K. Jews offers a sober and balanced perspective of the phenomenon, and bursts a few myths.