I am surprised how many people use international law as weapon against israel to deny israel rights for territory that belongs to her for over 3500 years. Tha two-stae solution was inmplementd in 1922, that`s enough.-- Mark Bernadiner If I say you are correct then that would imply a one state solution. Israel should outright annex all conquered territory and grant citizenship for all inhabitants, Palestinians and Jews as required by international law. Or do you propose ethnic cleansing to reject the Palestinians? Where would Israel send them? Other countries are not required to accept them and all that I know of have said they would not. So what is which is your solution to these implications? BTW, San Remo has no legal standing. The UN decisions supersede that.
Venezuela says three dead from Zika complications (AP)
from the article: UN chief to Israel: End 'provocative actions' in East Jerusalem
Among Israel-minded voters, Sanders would get the J Street vote, Bloomberg would garner AIPAC’s and Trump would scrounge for leftovers.00:50 12.02.16 | 0 comments