Lincoln's claim that Israel was the "aggressor" in 1967 is bizarre at the understatement. Nasser's blockade of the Tiran straits was a casus belli, as even the UN agreed. End of discussion. - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '20'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '18'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Dr. L. Brnd
    • 06.10.10 | 07:57 (IST)

    A thoroughly amateurish Lincoln inability to distinguish between aggression and pre-emptive attack. Israel's successes in 1967 against numerically vastly superior Egyptian and Syrian forces was only possible because Arab forces were deployed in forward attack positions, which made them vulnerable to a pre-emptive strive; ditto the massive Arab air forces, which were fueled and armed on the ramps, not in protective revetments and hangars, as anybody could see in famous IAF gun camera photos splayed all over the pages of TIME and LIFE of that period. June 1967 was not Pearl Harbor - America did not surround Japan, reject Japan's right to exist, mass invasion forces on Japan's borders, threaten to throw Japan into the sea. Every single fact available shows Egypt and Syria were plotting genocide, blundered by their Tiran straits blockade that started a war, giving Israel every legal right under UN Article 51 to pre-empt in self defense to prevent imminent attack. But then I suppose Mark will also insist that the Tutsi survivors of the Rwanda massacre had the right to defeat and toss the Hutu militias out of the country only AFTER they butchered 850,000 people. Jews have a different view - its called "Never Again".

    from the article: Newly released documents: Division and disarray on eve of Yom Kippur War
    First published 00:57 06.10.10 | Last updated 00:57 06.10.10
Haaretz Headlines
Settlers and police clash in the Beit El settlement, July 29, 2015.

Clashes in West Bank settlement as demolition begins

Court rejects appeal by contractor who built two structures in the settlement of Beit El; Habayit Hayehudi MK Moti Yogev: It is the High Court that should be demolished.

Banner calling on Obama to free Jonathan Pollard

Obama won't alter terms of Pollard's parole

Convicted Israeli spy will have to remain in the U.S. for five years after his release in November.

Ultra-Orthodox Jews walk at the Western Wall plaza in Jerusalem's Old City, July 26, 2015.

Jewish Agency to aid non-Orthodox conversions abroad

Chairman Natan Sharansky tells Haaretz that the agency's plan to provide conversion services in the Diaspora will not discriminate against non-Orthodox communities.

La rivière HaYarkon

Water Authority: Teva factory behind severe pollution

Exclusive: High levels of residue from diabetes, epilepsy and depression medicines found in Tel Aviv-area waterway.