Did the 6 assailants have the right to attack the defender in a public place? If the guy with the gun was the only assailant, you can be sure he would have shot their bodies or heads. If he was a terrorist, he wouldn't have stopped until he killed them, most often not even then. Ever seen a human body torn apart by a group of assailants with no weapons? How you know they didn't stone him first? Do you know stones also kill more than a few here? "Used to Post Here" is right on all counts. The desperate Jew-haters scream "Jewish terrorist" in some twisted try at "moral equivalence". The shooter's assailants are lucky they were shot only in the legs. But lots here say the Jew is guilty until proven innocent. Nothing new there, but as disgusting as ever.
Hello user Logout | profile
You have watched of 10 articles
France to force 1,000 people to leave Calais "jungle" migrant camp (Reuters)
from the article: Jewish gunman wounds two Palestinians in Jerusalem
The future of Aleppo will tell whether Syria can rise from the ashes
As long as fighters are willing to remain there, the besieged city will not fall. But life there will become hell.13:03 12.02.16 | 0 comments