Did the 6 assailants have the right to attack the defender in a public place? If the guy with the gun was the only assailant, you can be sure he would have shot their bodies or heads. If he was a terrorist, he wouldn't have stopped until he killed them, most often not even then. Ever seen a human body torn apart by a group of assailants with no weapons? How you know they didn't stone him first? Do you know stones also kill more than a few here? "Used to Post Here" is right on all counts. The desperate Jew-haters scream "Jewish terrorist" in some twisted try at "moral equivalence". The shooter's assailants are lucky they were shot only in the legs. But lots here say the Jew is guilty until proven innocent. Nothing new there, but as disgusting as ever.
Security cabinet meeting convened to assess security situation in Israel's south ends (Haaretz)
from the article: Jewish gunman wounds two Palestinians in Jerusalem
The New York businessman wasn’t the casino mogul's first choice for president, but Adelson concludes that he 'will be good for Israel.'08:23 06.05.16 | 0 comments