Julian's 4th century 3rd Temple was NOT on the Temple Mount - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Ivar
    • 16.10.07 | 11:04 (IST)

    Julian's Third Temple project is conveniently detailed at: http://bibleprobe.com/rebuildingthetemple.htm 1. Herod Agrippa ruled from 37-44, making him a daily eyewitness to the glory of Herod's Temple, which his testimony located to the South of the present Temple Mount. In Julian's (355-363) day, though the Jews knew well the location of their temple, all physical traces of it had been removed. There was NO Western Wall! 2. There is no historic evidence locating Julian's construction on the "Temple Mount". Indeed, the descriptions from which the location might be deduced harmonize far better with the location to the South of the Temple Mount in various articles presented at http://www.askelm.com/temple/t991001.htm 3. The first link above indeed REFUTES the possibility that Julian's aborted temple project could possibly have been on the Temple Mount, on account of the report of total absence of any part of the earlier temple structure. Here we read that the local Jews carried away what remains of the temple could be found, such that NONE of the original structure remained. 4. The Waqf basement excavations on the Temple Mount PROVE that both First and Second Temple debris were swept up from the broad environs of the Temple Mount area and used as FILL by the Temple Mount builder, who could ONLY HAVE BEEN JUSTINIAN, AND NOT HEROD, BECAUSE HEROD WOULD NOT HAVE PUT SECOND TEMPLE DEBRIS DEEP WITHIN HIS ALLEGED TEMPLE MOUNT. Also, these debris have contained Roman coins and artifacts clearly decades after the completion of the Second Temple. The fill of the Temple Mount clearly dates it after Herod the Great. 5. The Temple Mount was the location of the Roman fortress of Antonia, and the seat of the Roman government of Jerusalem and Judea. The Hashmonean architectural features which may be authentic would have served the prominent and politically central Antonia fortress, and not the Temple Mount. Robinson's and Warren's Arches in the Temple Mount could just as well have been Justinian's handiwork.

    from the article: Likud urges Shas, Lieberman to quit gov't over PM's 'intention'
    First published 00:00 16.10.07 | Last updated 00:00 16.10.07
Haaretz Headlines
Benjamin Netanyahu

Netanyahu says ready to go to Ramallah to meet Abbas

Israel's PM meets with four leaders of 'Women Wage Peace' group, who recently held 50-day hunger strike in front of his Jerusalem residence.

An illustrative image of a classroom in Jerusalem.

Education in Israel is based on separation

Between Jews and Arabs, rich and poor, center and periphery, and between outstanding students and slow learners.

Gefilte fish

Food fights: Jewish cuisine makes U.S. headlines

Hillary emails about gefilte fish, Obama walks miles for a bagel and Netanyahu gets slammed for snails.

Bread soup (ribollita) with chard pesto

Green leaves of summer: 2 recipes with Swiss chard

These Italian-inspired dishes take advantage of this nutrient-packed leaf, so popular among Israelis.