"In most ways post-zionism is more historically accurate than zionism since it is freed by the need to scew historical fact in order to reach an end goal." Oh, and the "post-Zionists" don't have an end goal they want to achieve? How naieve can one be? You think 'new historians' like Benny Morris are sticklers for accuracy? They seek acceptance and 'fame' among the international academia. And they got what they wanted.In any other forum, they would be dismissed for their lack of scholarship.
from the article: Post-Zionism doesn't exist