It is indisputable that when Res 181 refers to "an Arab state" it is making no attempt to define Palestine as "the nation-state for the Arab people" i.e. you can only regard "an Arab state" as a DESCRIPTIVE term, but if you do that for "an Arab state" then you must also do that for "a Jewish state". But I'm curious how *you* can reconcile this problem i.e. if "a Jewish state" means "the nation-state for the Jewish people" then "an Arab state" must also mean "the nation-state for the Arab people", which absurd.
Hello user Logout | profile
You have watched of 10 articles
Syrian opposition: Russian strikes kill 18, wound dozens in northern town held by insurgents (AP)
from the article: Erekat: No unilateral declaration of Palestinian state