Lest be crystal clear aboutr that. 1) When the IDF attack Hammas outposts because of their dirty activity of launching rockets against Israel, lots of innocent people are killed. The equation is clear. Israel attacks terrorists who in order to defend themselves in a most cowardly manner hide themsleves in populous areas. In other words, the palestinian chlidren killed by Israel are the result of Hammas tactics not of Israel's intention. 2) In the attack on Itamar, the palestinian criminals went directly to kill innofensive chlidren. The criminal act itself was done in the classical style of islamic ritual murder: Slaughtering. The same style was done againts Theo Van Ghog in Amsterdam. The conlcusions are crystal clear: a) These barabaric islamists sacrifice their chlidren in order to use them as human shields against Israel deffensive war. b) They killed Jewish children in the most fanatic type of slaughtering. That is the Islamic way. How to deal with them? Fight them, never accept their terms and probably even a good way to deterr them is by settling in their neighborhoods. Always challenging them,. never giving up. Even those that are in favor of a two state solution, must reflect again. The only response is challenging them. In Europe the response provided by liberals as Merkel Sarkozy or Cameron is shifting from multiculturalism to nationalism. That is the proper answer against Ilamic challnege. In the Middle East resistance is manifested in supporting Israel. Sooner or later most of Western democracies will shift to the right and understand that at this moment Israel is the only barrier against islamization. Indeed Bernard Lewis was right. Sad to admit it, but that is the true.
Hello user Logout | profile
You have watched of 10 articles
EU envoy slams Syria for gaps in chemical weapons declaration (AP)