Iran Nuclear Ambitions - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • James
    • 14.12.05 | 12:07 (IST)

    Look the military option is not a realistic option. The Iranians have been very cleaver, normally speaking if you want to build bombs you need a nuclear reactor either a heavy water, or breeder, there is another way though with cyclotrons, none of the nuclear powers use this method because it is very slow, with several steps involved, much faster to use reactors. The one advantage of cyclotrons is that each step is independent from the others, can be done small scale and can be done in widely distributed sites. and every step but the last one is perfectly legal under the treaties. The Iranians can build a lot of redundancy into the system, which means that a lot of sites would have to be targeted. And what will be Israel's response to the rocketing of Its own installations, which is what will happen after an attack on Iran. That is unless the attack has also taken out all Iran's missile sites as well. Such a large scale attack would be tantamount to war, and the US will not let Israel attempt it as long as they are mired next door in Iraq. It maybe that Israel is willing to take some damage to slow down Iran's march to the nuclear club, but because of its distributed, and easily reconstituted nature, the slowdown would be short lived, and depending on the amount of the reprisal damage it would seems unlikely that Israel would want a second round. The other way to stop Iran's movement towards the bomb is to offer it something that it wants more. What that is I don't Know but I suspect an denuclearized ME would be a good starting point, and I suggest that a real settlement of the Palestinian issue with honor, and a comprehensive peace with the Arab states is more important than ever.

    from the article: Ahmadinejad can continue to smile while the world argues
    First published 00:00 13.12.05 | Last updated 00:00 13.12.05
Haaretz Headlines
Aleppo

Hundreds killed in Aleppo foretell a major political achievement for Assad

The fighting highlights how Russia is winning at the West's expense, and underscores the paradox in which the West (together with Russia) focuses on ISIS while Assad regime continues to kill Syrian civilians in much greater numbers.

Elie Wiesel.

Newly unearthed version of Elie Wiesel's seminal work is a scathing indictment of God

In Wiesel’s uncensored Hebrew 'Night' manuscript, unveiled here for the first time, the author expresses desire to take revenge on the Hungarians, lashes out at fellow Jews and describes sexual scenes from the train to Auschwitz.

Adolf Hitler in 1938.

Ex-London mayor's nonsense on Hitler nonetheless touches raw Zionist nerve

The explosive dilemma of 'collaboration' with the Nazis in order to save German Jews split the Zionist movement in the 1930s.

U.S. President Barack Obama speaks at the White House Correspondents Association's annual dinner

WATCH: Obama slams Trump at White House correspondents' dinner

U.S. president calls Republican establishment 'incredulous', jokes that Trump's involvement in Miss Universe pageant makes up for minimal foreign policy experience.