Why does intelligent design theory primarily appeal to those who demonstate the least evidence of being intelligently designed? Intelligent design posits a philosophical question, not a scientific one. As a practicing Roman Catholic, I believe in the transubstantiation, but I cannot claim any scientific basis for my belief. What is most disturbing about this push to each ID as science is its intellectual corruption: What we can't explain must have a supernatural explanation. God becomes the "gap filler" of our knowledge. Heaven help us if that becomes the basis for future scientific enquiry.
Hello user Logout | profile
You have watched of 10 articles
Iraqi police fire tear gas as thousands of protests burst into Green Zone, storm Parliament (AP)
from the article: The absurdity of intelligent design
Livingstone’s nonsense on Hitler nonetheless touches raw Zionist nerve
The explosive dilemma of 'collaboration' with the Nazis in order to save German Jews split the Zionist movement in the 1930s.00:01 01.05.16 | 0 comments