Why does intelligent design theory primarily appeal to those who demonstate the least evidence of being intelligently designed? Intelligent design posits a philosophical question, not a scientific one. As a practicing Roman Catholic, I believe in the transubstantiation, but I cannot claim any scientific basis for my belief. What is most disturbing about this push to each ID as science is its intellectual corruption: What we can't explain must have a supernatural explanation. God becomes the "gap filler" of our knowledge. Heaven help us if that becomes the basis for future scientific enquiry.
Hello user Logout | profile
You have watched of 10 articles
Trump: Iran deal is a disgrace and embarrassment to this country (Haaretz)
from the article: The absurdity of intelligent design