If we used the proper definition of a refugee when referering to palestinians they would not be a threat - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • zionist forever
    • 19.05.11 | 17:32 (IDT)

    A few facts this article has wrong firstly anybody under 63 is not a refugee and even UN resolution 194 says nothing about right of return applying to descendants. In reality the " real " refugees are not a threat to Israel anymore considering the bulk of them are dead and if somebody who was a new born baby in 1948 are not going to be having children today if they are now 63. Its time to stop referring to the descendants as refugees in their own right. Once we do that we will have made a huge political step forward. As for the idea of Israel keeping the people in camps the 2 bodies to blame for that is the PLO and the UN. In the late 70s & early 80s the Israeli government adopted a policy where they would build the equivilent of modern arab settlements in Gaza. Israel would build the basics then anybody who wanted to move there then Israel would part fund the building of homes and in exchange they would allow their home in the camp to be pulled down. The thinking was they would gradually replace the camps with arab settlements because as more people move the more space for more settlements. The program was eventuallyt canceled for 2 because the PLO threatened to execute anybody who took up the offer out of fear it would make the people more accepting of Israel. and the UN passed as resolution condemning Israel for it and to return the people who had taken up the offer to be returned to the camps. In the end the government considered it was a waste of money because people were afraid to accept the offer but Israel made the effort the bodies that supposedly represent the palestinians were the ones why it didn't change.

    from the article: Palestinian refugees are a threat to Israel's existence
    First published 01:37 19.05.11 | Last updated 01:37 19.05.11
Haaretz Headlines
An Israeli soldier aims towards Palestinian protesters

Two Palestinian teens killed in West Bank clashes with IDF

Army says soldiers were fired at when they arrived at the scene of a rock-throwing incident near Jenin.

Donald Trump, with Jeb Bush in the background, following the CBS Republican debate.

Trump tempts fate by slaying sacred Republican cows

By pinning the blame for 9/11 on George W. Bush, Trump goes where even Democrats fear to tread.

Minister Regev, ex-President Moshe Katsav and businessman David Appel.

Regev lobbied for leniency for rapist ex-president Katsav

Culture Minister Regev asked prison service in 2013 why Katsav could not receive a furlough for Jewish New Year.

A sign painted on a wall in the West Bank town of Bethlehem calling to boycott Israel, June 2015.

How I learned to fall in love with sanctions

Sanctions did not devastate South Africa or Iran. Nor will they destroy Israel; above all it will extricate Israel from a trap it is unable to get out of by itself.