If only Bush and Sharon had had the sense to keep Syria inLebanon - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Tosefta
    • 21.10.07 | 19:14 (IST)

    Bush the ideologue and Sharon the tactician-only banded together banded together to push Syria out of Lebanon. Israel got into trouble right then and there. We already got the Lebanon war as a first installment, and there will be more to come perhaps. Syria came in to impose order and stop the Civil War, and did succeed in this. It was also in Israel's interest to have Syria there. When an attack by Hizballah occured, Sharon could hold Syria responsible and in fact destroyed a couple of Syrian radar station in retaliation. Hizballah came under control. With Syria out, there is nobody to blame but Hizballah, and we have already seen the result. More than this. With Syria in Lebanon, there was always the possibility of a Grand Deal with Syria; they get Lebanon and in return leave the Golan for Israel. All could have been happy. (I don't count the Lebanese.) On the day Syria left Lebanon I said that this was the day Israel lost the Golan. Lebanon is actually an artificial and unstable country, ripe for another civil war. It was created by the French for the Christians, who were 51% of the population at the time, but is now some 30% only. The Shiites are the largest group and may take over at some point, perhaps after a bloody war. For such a country, it is good to be absorbed by a larger country with a strong central government which will bring stability. In the long run, all would have been happy (and now I include the Lebanese).

    from the article: Lebanese Druze leader calls on U.S. to impose sanctions on Syria
    First published 00:00 21.10.07 | Last updated 00:00 21.10.07
Haaretz Headlines
Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked.

Israel's Justice Ministry drawing up law against torture

Attorney general and justice minister must approve legislation, but is already clear that there will be opposition to bill having been presented before the United Nations Convention Against Torture.

Flags fly at half mast at NATO headquarters, Brussels, Belgium, March 23, 2016.

Turkey lifts veto, NATO okays Israel office in its Brussels HQ

Jerusalem interprets the Turkish decision as another sign that Ankara desires to normalize relations with Israel.

IDF forces working at the Gaza-Israel border, on Monday.
Mortar shell fired at Israeli troops from Gaza

No one was injured in the incident; the Israeli military responds with fire.

10:38 04.05.16 | 0 comments
Britain's opposition Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn joins a doctors and teachers protest in centr

Labour scandal illustrates Zionism's main problem

The government's attempt to confuse anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism ignores the fact that Zionism can no longer fulfill the heart’s desire of the citizens of the state it founded.