I predict that the challengers will win - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • An Israeli
    • 07.06.13 | 16:36 (IDT)

    As I understand it, the law provides an absentee is anyone who, at any time between the Nov 1947 and the end of the state of emergency (which is to say now as the state of emergency is still in force) owned property in Israel and who at any time during the said period was either a) a citizen of one of the enemy countries, or b) who left Israel for one of the enemy countries or c) who was a Palestinian citizen according to the provisions of the Palestinian Citizenship Orders, 1925-1941 and left his usual place of residence in Israel for areas controlled by the armies trying to prevent the establishment of the state of Israel. 1) Technically this would make most the Mizrachi Jews who immigrated from Egypt, Iraq etc and who owned property in Israel fall into category a) because they were citizens of enemy states during said period. However since the law was never applied to them, I would think that the challengers should win, as law can't be applied in a discriminatory manner. 2) In East Jerusalem in particular, the land in question was not 'in Israel' when this law was passed. A general principle of law is that it can't be applied retroactively which this would be doing. The best solution would be for the court to declare to order the government to end the state of emergency.

    from the article: Israel's Absentee Property Law exposes an absence of morality in Jerusalem
    First published 12:40 07.06.13 | Last updated 12:40 07.06.13
Haaretz Headlines
Donald Trump talks to reporters just before casting his ballot in New York, April 19, 2016.

Trump rejects Duke's remarks: 'Anti-Semitism has no place in our society'

Former KKK leader blamed Republican Jews for attempting to block Trump's nomination, prompting ADL to urge Trump to disavow statement.

The Qalandiyah checkpoint following the shooting of two Palestinian siblings, April 27, 2016.

Israel investigates West Bank shooting of Palestinian siblings

Court imposes a gag order on the investigation of the killing last week of a 23-year-old Palestinian woman and her 16-year-old brother at Qalandiyah checkpoint.

Members of IfNotNow march through the streets of Washington, D.C.

IfNotNow and the perils of being a 'single-issue' Diaspora Jew

It's little wonder that those who remember they are Jews only when its time to criticize the Jewish state have zero influence on the Jewish community.

Illustration by Daniel Goldfarb

On-campus BDS brawl is turning young Jews off Israel

Assailed from both sides, many Jewish students at California universities say they're afraid to get involved in the increasingly heated debate over Israel.