One can argue that the custom of Pideon ha ben is indeed a replacement for human sacrifice as it falls in the category of the first fruits and the first born is the Lords.However regular animal sacrifices were done for a whole range of issues from minor to major.Secondly Pideon ha ben was a replacement being the key word here,not a ritualised form of sacrifie but a replacement.The eucharist is understood to be the actual bllod and fleash of jesus.Thirdly jews are not accusing christians of a blood fetish and making demonic claims about them are we?Thats the difference.
Hello user Logout | profile
You have watched of 10 articles
Egypt policeman's conviction overturned in protester's death (AP)
from the article: And supposing they did drink blood?