(1)Israel denied the story and (2) accused the messenger of anti-semiism. (1R) Now it admits that the story is true, (2R) Claims it was not racist in selection. (3R) Sole body parts across the racial spectrum. (4R) Claims the policy has changed and has stopped. (1) is an UNTRUTH (2) is an UNTRUTH: Common knee-jerk reaction/ defense mechanism; A PROJECTION of internal values: Prejudice against non jews, non white jews & Arabs in Israeli culture is well documented everywhere, see other comments for proof. (3)TRUE: Numerous accounts of jewish families setting up guard on the deceased, to stop unauthorized "autopsy". (4) Cannot be trusted: The "Hannibal option" exposed recently as current policy -not abandoned as claimed: (A soldier in danger of/or kidnapped is shot/killed or commits strategic suicide (suicide bombing) to prevent becoming a hostage) Is zionist policies -unauthorized organ harvesting, preemptive death tactics compatible with jewish faith or community values?
Hello user Logout | profile
You have watched of 10 articles
Donald Trump says Republican race all but over if he wins Indiana (Reuters)
from the article: Guardian: Our Israeli organ harvesting headline was serious error