he will be given a chance but Bibi will still attack Iran if needed even if obama objects - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • zionist forever
    • 16.06.13 | 09:33 (IDT)

    True there might be some in the Obama administration possibly even including Obama himself who will fall for the idea of this guy bing classed as a "moderate" but at the end of the day it comes down to policy not titles of are you moderate or radical. Bibi will demand progress on the nuclear issue and if non is made then the threats of an attack will resurface. If needed Bibi will do this without even informing Obama the way Begin didn't inform Carter in advance when he attacked Saddams nuclear factuality probably because he knew Carter would try pressure him into calling off the attack, Once the attack has happened not much Carter could do about it other than support UN sanctions condemning Israel for the attack which he did. In the US Congress has just voted in favour of the US not trying to hold back Israel in any military action it chooses to take in the face of ex tinctinal threats and an Iranian nuke is one of them. Bibi will tone things down for now but if he sees no progress which is unlikely because in Iran a moderate doesn't mean revolutionary attitude in policy it means he is less outspoken like Ahmadinejad. and the real power in Iran lies in the hands of the ayatollahs and what they say goes. He wouldn't even have been a presidential candidate if the ayatollahs thought he was going to be a major reformer. he is a wolf in a she eps clothing so don't anybody get their hope for new Iranian policies yet. I very much doubt we will see an end to the nuclear program or end support for Hezbollah anytime soon.

    from the article: With a moderate as Iran's new face, Netanyahu will struggle to draw up support for an attack
    First published 02:50 16.06.13 | Last updated 00:21 16.06.13
Haaretz Headlines
Former London Mayor Ken Livingstone leaves his home in London, Britain April 29, 2016.

Ex-London mayor cites Netanyahu's Mufti comments to defend 'Zionist Hitler' claim

Ken Livingstone says he's 'sorry' for furor and any offence his comments might have caused, but stands by their validity, saying Netanyahu's Mufti comments prove as much.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with German Chancellor Angela Merkel in Berlin, February 16, 2016.

'Despite report, Israel-German ties between are good, and will continue to be'

Der Spiegel report said German officials no longer willing to unequivocally support Israel, quoted Merkel as saying she 'understands' Palestinians attempt to turn to UN.

Illustration photo: Gay couple hold hands

Gay couple wounded in homophobic attack in Israeli resort town of Eilat

Couple say a group of youths mocked them and then accosted them for their sexual orientation, but police say confrontation seems to have been mutually pursued.

Adolf Hitler in 1938.
Livingstone’s nonsense on Hitler nonetheless touches raw Zionist nerve

The explosive dilemma of 'collaboration' with the Nazis in order to save German Jews split the Zionist movement in the 1930s.

00:01 01.05.16 | 0 comments