Hammas and Fatah can do tactical steps - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '2'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '15'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • arik
    • 09.06.11 | 15:40 (IDT)

    to get a settlement. They will never, but never accept the principle of jewish self determination, namely a jewish state no matter how big or small it is. The meaning of being moderate in Hammas terms, is someone that is ready to grant a Huddna for 10 years in exchange for full Israel withdrawall. Absolutely mads these guys. Fatah is ready to recognize Israel without recognizing the legitimate jewish right to self determination. Fatah will never give up the prinicple of Hakk el Ahuida ( the right of return of palestinian refugees intto Israel) They can compromise about numbers nor principles. In short they want a political settlement that would let the ground open for a "democratic" or a non democratic" extintion of the state of Israel. Israel should not let them prevail. The issue is very simply. Is a state important for the palestinians.??? Then the trade off is recognition of the jewish state, refugees to Palestine, and borders it is fine that the frame of the debate should be 67 with swaps. A good deal would be that te "triangle" would be included within the palestinian state. The PALESTINIANS ARE SO ENCLOSED IN THEIR IDEIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS, THAT THEY WILL NEVER ACHIEVE STATEHOOD. This is the opposite pole of pragmatism. It is better for both sides. The area could be dfined as "zona franca" free tax, so Israel arabs which will be part of Palestine would not ne harmed by their changing of citizenship.

    from the article: Palestinian leadership divided over plan to seek UN recognition
    First published 02:19 09.06.11 | Last updated 02:19 09.06.11
Haaretz Headlines
President Barack Obama, July 7, 2015. What is he thinking with his Iranian strategy?

Obama: If we attack Iran, Israel will pay the price

U.S. president stressed during meet with more than 20 U.S. Jewish leaders that if U.S. attacks Iran, Hezbollah would fire missiles on Tel Aviv.

Obama and Netanyahu at the White House, 2011.

Bibi stokes Shoah guilt to pit U.S. Jews against Obama

75 years ago it was his father who rallied Republicans and railed against kowtowing Jewish leaders, writes Chemi Shalev.

A relative holds up a photo of Ali Dawabsheh in the torched house in Duma, July 31, 2015.

Calling hate crimes 'price tag attacks' is offensive

After the murder of a Palestinian baby last week, Benjamin Netanyahu declared that 'terror is terror.' Yet the way we label attacks by either side is radically different.

Writing and images were daubed onto the walls using mud and soot

Ancient mikveh found during Jerusalem construction

Second Temple-era ritual bath - plastered in Aramaic graffiti - found after a stone suddenly vanished into an unknown underground cave.