"Goldstone used the account of the air strike as a sign that Israel's attack on the mill was not mere collateral damage, but precisely targeted and a possible war crime". So basically what this tells us Goldstone based his "opinion" on an "account" he heard. Again forensic evidence no bomb shrapnel just an "account". Its hard to fathom how such a one sided investigation can be legitimized and considered and great investigation based on unsubtantiated "accounts". I guess when the real aim is to deligimitize a nation ( Israel) then facts and morality go out the door. How this little man can look at himself in the mirror is a disgrace. And to those on here that simply lap up the UN findings as factual and legitimate are just as culpable as Goldstone and the UN for spreading false and malicious propaganda.
Hello user Logout | profile
You have watched of 10 articles
France will not take in more than 30,000 refugees, prime minister say (DPA)
from the article: Report: UN evidence counters Israel's account of Gaza war