I also take issue with Avineri's criticism of the view that Judaism is fundamentally a religious, rather than a national, phenomenon. The religious component of Judaism has survived thousands of years; the state is a few decades old. It seems rather rash to jettison that which has stood us in good faith throughout the centuries for the sake of a new ideological trend. I would suggest that the need to deny the validity of post-Zionism derives from the refusal to contemplate the inclusion of the religious component in the national narrative.
Clinton: U.S. must "make clear" to Putin that Russia cannot be creating chaos in Syria (Reuters)
from the article: Post-Zionism doesn't exist