Silly article, full of straw arguments and tendentious thinking. It's the sort of upside down thinking whereby "Jews who demand the right to pray on the Temple Mount " somehow represent the lack of freedom of religion while acquiescing to the overbearing and one-sided demands of the waqf is about maintaining calm and allowing the deluded to pretend there is indeed freedom of religion. Makes no sense. As for all the other arguments that purport to show ZOA in the worst light, they could be applied as well - no, better - to Hamas, Islamic Jihad, etc. But then you wouldn't get the chance to besmirch Israel, would you?
Aden hotel used by Yemen goverment hit by grenade (Reuters)
from the article: When 'pro-Israel' means comparing Israel to the Nazis