"Oh what tangled webs we weave" You're the only one who's confused here, WWACD. Let me spell it out for you. Syria certainly does have nuclear facilities. It is, for example, working on extraction of uranium from its vast phosphate deposits. These facilities are all known to, and approved by the IAEA. The IAEA even helps these projects. It does not have a nuclear reactor. The propaganda being pumped out that the IAF hit a nuclear reactor is a lie. It hit something, and my belief is that it is one of the nuclear facilities that are known to the IAEA. Clear now?
Russian airstrikes hit Syrian provinces of Hama and Idlib (Reuters)
from the article: Syria denies it confirmed target of IAF strike was nuclear facility