This ruling is a total farce. They are presuming harm of a child who is sexually intact, - because he'd be different. That is silly. He'd have complete genitals, while everyone else is incomplete. AND if he father wanted him intact, then he'd be intact. Period. So he'd suffer the presumed harm, - like other intact kids in Israel. Which is probably none, and it if isn't, it is because the adults are behaving like jerks. Grow up already. Sexual mutilation of children is SO Stone Age.
Hello user Logout | profile
You have watched of 10 articles
Initial report of stabbing attack in South Hebron Hills (Haaretz)