Each woman came with their own story, but no women corroborated the story of another woman. It was , from what i've read here on haaretz, multiple lone victims without evidence or witnesses. Simply their word against his. And only one of them claimed rape, the others claimed abuse. So one woman claiming rape without evidence can get a man in jail? This bit about contradictions in his testimony is puzzling- why does that somehow imply he's guilty? Maybe he was frustrated and coming undone by the whole process, but you cannot prove the man is guilty based on his own testimony that claimed his innocence??!! Does someone have a satisfactory explanation for this?
Law expanding definition of terrorist activity passes first Knesset reading (Haaretz)