Oslo was an interim accord, and it was a dead-end. You admit it. So why suggest that an interim accord is what the two sides should attempt this time? Why is it any less a recipe for failure than it was at Oslo? Barak Obama and ALL THE OTHERS insist upon a final peace agreement precisely because there is universal concensus that Yet Another Interim Agreement will be the final death of this process. We have been there, done that. Try. Something. New.
Suspect Bangkok bomber arrested, found with possible bomb-making materials (Reuters)
from the article: A different approach