"yet at the same time England is not open for musleum refugees influx." The difference between Israel and England should be obvious i.e. England isn't under a legal obligation to take "muslim refugees" because it wasn't responsible for making them refugees in the first place. Int'l law says that at end-of-conflict a refugee is entitled to return back to his/her home, and in *this* case that home is "in Israel", not "in England".
Hello user Logout | profile
You have watched of 10 articles
Carly Fiorina suspends 2016 White House bid (Reuters)
from the article: U.S.: We want clear path, not two-month delay of peace process deadlock