Assailant was shot on scene; the victims, in their early 20s, were evacuated to Jerusalem hospitals.07:38 27.11.15 | 0 comments
And Ernst gives his 'unbiased' assessment of the two contributors.NOT. Heres my assessment of what you've assessed. You set out to demonstrate what you wanted to demonstrate.El Birawi gives a tongue firmly in cheek thumbs up to Sharon, and ziggurat naturally enough sees through the thinly veiled condemnation of Sharon and gives a reasoned response. Certainly not a venomous or hateful one. I see two moderate if perhaps slightly biased posters giving a brief analysis vis a vis Sharon. If we were talking about Abbas, I dont think you would see much gloating or bad thoughts directed to his sick bed. Arafat was another matter, as he was regarded by most (not just Jewish)people as a heinous terrorist for many years. Only the intellectual lefties of Europe came to regard him as a 'romantic' figure many years after first coming to prominenece.It is natural that most posters never came to see him in such a light. You then go on to reveal your own prejudiced and unsupported claims thus:"The Israeli concept is that their enemies are all terrorists, and therefore are equal to dogs and insects". You can never hope to provide any proof for such an absurd generalisation.I can think of maybe 1 or 2 regular posters who would fit your otherwise libelous description. Even the referral to "dogs and insects" in your post harks back to false accusations made against Israeli politicians.(Begin and cockroaches?)You are prone to the same insensitivities and gross exaggerations that you falsely attribute to pro Israeli posters on this forum. I am talking about linguistics and politeness of proper human beings like you and me? So take off your shades and look in the mirror.