"An Israeli attack on Iran would be the start of a protracted conflict that would be unlikely to prevent the eventual acquisition of nuclear weapons by Iran and might even encourage it," Are they not sufficiently encouraged now? Was the nuclear site at Qom developed for peaceful purposes. These think tanks are pretty short-sighted. Why don't they think about a nuclear armed Iran and how the world would manage that situation. Imagine when Iran tells France to stop banning the burqa or the Swiss to stop banning the minarets and Iran has nuclear-tipped IBCMs.
Hello user Logout | profile
You have watched of 10 articles
Preliminary report: Shooting attack in East Jerusalem's Damascus Gate (Haaretz)
from the article: Israel attack wouldn't stop Iran nuclear program, says U.K. study