With all due respects to Auschwitz survivor and Nobel Laureate - he apparently does not even begin to appreciate the incongruity of his argument about the Jews history in Jerusalem - in its American context. If Jerusalem belongs in entirety to the Jews due to their ancient presence there, then the USA belongs to the Red Indians. Would Wiesel himself be willing to give up his own house and return it to a Red Indian? In effect, that is what he is insinuating the Arabs of East Jerusalem do.
Knesset passes 'Norwegian Law' allowing ministers to resign their seats, remain in cabinet (Haaretz)
from the article: How will Netanyahu respond to Obama's ultimatum?