The Professor never claimed Jews "drank' Christian blood. His claims were far more modest and possible. What bothers me is that the tabloid journalists have badly misrepresented what he did say. That he will see his career destroyed as a consequence is not in dispute. What is in dispute is whether any historian can ever question the common fantasy with the difficult possibility.
Yemeni ISIS affiliate claims responsibility for Sanaa mosque bombing (Reuters)
from the article: MKs demand the author of blood libel book be prosecuted