The idea that Stewart can simply claim the idea should pass in the UN is lacking of any thorough judgment. He is a smart man, no doubt, but if i know you are good at US politics, i can predict with just about Zero percent accuracy how good you will be at something else. There is a difference between simply stating something and explaining something. In other words, i can say, Palestine can be a state in the UN, but without having any logical backing it is meaningless. Stewart may have his views, but he does not have any logical backing for them other than a political mindset. Peace will only come at the digression of the two parties, not a resolution.
NATO backs Turkey's fight against ISIS (Reuters)
from the article: Jon Stewart lampoons Obama’s stance on Palestinian statehood