Or did they make sure there would be no counter arguments by not announcing their intentions to give their own versions. Only Goldstone could have walked away with one a sided argument and not announced he had depositions that he would use. If he had any interest in balance he would have approached groups who openly signed their names unlike the "breaking the silence" crowd who reported hearsay while "soldiers speak out" spoke out and signed their names" ^ IDF soldiers give testimonies to counter Gaza war crimes claims, Haaretz, July 16, 2009 ^ 'Breaking the Silence' vs. 'Soldiers Speak Out' on Cast Lead, Arutz 7, July 23, 2009
Iranian parliamentary panel gives conditional nod to nuke deal (Reuters)
from the article: Im Tirtzu hides behind respectable mask of 'Zionism'