Copy/past my post and delete the word "Popper" and read again. Now read your reply. Unless you are hopelessly blocking out the argument that may lead straight to the "disqualification" of Kemp's statements, you will not fail to see that you forgot to react to any of points listed, including the sentence containing "Popper". You get carried away - should I say comfortably away from addressing Kemp's sentence when you go on about me believing "Popper has an inductive methodology" of which I had no intention to believe or to disbelieve here. Read my post again. I was referring by analogy to Poppers' critique of psychoanalysis as a "theory" which can offer from within itself opposite interpretations in response to different factual inputs and is therefore "immune" from empiric data. Kemp's statement appears as a positive and valid statement insofar there are plenty of cases of far worse cases of military abuse. The trouble is in "more than any other in the history", since...
U.S. warns governments, bankers Iran sanctions still in place (Reuters)
from the article: Lawyers in EU draw up list of alleged IDF war criminals