Unveiled at industry conference, plan takes top treasury official by surprise.00:02 27.11.15 | 0 comments
That 67 borders are indefensible is a complete crock as justification for not accepting them. Regardless of where Israel sets its borders they will be indefensible. Missile technology makes everyones borders vulnerable in this modern age. No-one can guarantee their borders are defensible until after the battle and they find themselves having survived. Technology moves fast these days. That being said....the declared and legal borders of Israel were defensible in 1948. In fact when Israel launched its attack in the Six Day War, it did so from outside its Sovereign Territory. So Danon and Netanyahu's argument can be seen for what it is...a con job to keep Palestinian Territory. As for Palestinians having a demilitarized state....Palestinians need a substantial defense against Israel....history proves Israel is a threat to Palestine.