"Caradon was perfectly clear." He most certainly was! "I defend the resolution as it stands. What it states, as you know, is first the general principle of inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war. That means that you can?t justify holding onto territory merely because you conquered it. We could have said: well, you go back to the 1967 line. But I know the 1967 line, and it?s a rotten line. You couldn?t have a worse line for a permanent international boundary. It?s where the troops happened to be on a certain night in 1948. It?s got no relation to the needs of the situation." "Had we said that you must go back to the 1967 line, which would have resulted if we had specified a retreat from all the occupied territories, we would have been wrong." Now, cummings, argue with Caradon about his own interpretation of his own resolution, clown.
Defense Ministry says had no knowledge of alleged improper defense deals by Gal Hirsch (Haaretz)
from the article: Youth protesting settlement freeze block Jerusalem entrance