I will start with the easier 'contra' option: 1. I believe Abbas himself does not agree to a partial peace agreement. He wants all the issues resolved first. He knows that the "temporary" might become permanent, especially with borders that include about 40% of the West Bank. I believe he is actually right. Fayyad is a fine man, but with little public following. 2. With a Palestinian state, tensions will grow on the ground and incident will multiply, Israel will not be able to exert enough control (such as entering an arresting people in "free" Palestine. 1. The new situation might make it easier to push the US to pressure Israel to change its policy of delaying forever. 2. Likud cannot ideologically accept even a small state in the West Bank, and Netanyahu the weak leader will not persuade it. Likud will fall under the pressure, perhaps even split apart, giving a chance for progress. I vote for the EU initiative. We have to move ahead of dated ideologies and messiah myths.
EU urges Turkey to keep border open to Syrian refugees (AP)
from the article: EU initiative: Recognition of Palestinian state by next year
It follows their Facebook pages, uses fake profiles to 'befriend' them and presents screenshots of posts in court – this is how Israel Police is adding social activists to its virtual surveillance list. 'They know what I write and do,' Ethiopian protest leader says.09:46 06.02.16 | 2 comments
The Syrian army is rapidly closing in on the rebels who are in control of the city, leaving a narrow corridor through which civilians are escaping on foot; Russian and Iranian support are tipping the balance in Assad's favor.01:04 06.02.16 | 1 comments
If you don’t conduct some sort of discussion with the most fanatic people on the other side, you won’t understand them – or yourself.12:24 06.02.16 | 0 comments