Comparison: Iraq and Lebanon wars - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Ben Gurion
    • 04.08.06 | 04:23 (IDT)

    There are a number of similarities between these two wars: 1. Wars started under false pretenses; WMD threat in Iraq, missile threat from Lebanon. (The missiles not very deadly and no existential threat.) 2. Both wars were seen (at least by US), falsely, as wars on international terror. Saddam had no such connection, while Hizballah is a LOCAL, not int'l anti-civilization threat. 3. Both wars seen (By US; Olmert not that stupid) as ways to establish democracy in Middle East. (Hard to do if the country falls into civil war.) 4. Both countries deeply divided among 3 major groups. Need a much softer approach. 5. Infrastructure in both countries almost entirely destroyed. (Unplanned consequence in Iraq, in Lebanon who knows.) 6. Invaders suffer many more losses than planned, and stay in much longer than planned. (Israel suck in a security strip.) 7. Invaders do not achieve their goals: Hardly a democracy in Iraq; Hizballah alive and kicking in Lebanon. 8. Iran is the main beneficiary in both wars. Saddam is gone, and Hizballah is seen as potent power by all. 9. Both wars start for Oedipal reasons: Bush and his Papa, Olmert wanting to be tougher than Sharon. It didn?t help that both leaders were novices. 10. Both wars destroy the reputations of the aggressors; Dumbya will be a historical joke, Olmert may soon find out.

    from the article: Between two friends
    First published 00:00 03.08.06 | Last updated 00:00 03.08.06
Haaretz Headlines
A poster of Syrian President Bashar Assad in Damascus, Syria.

Ya'alon: Syria will not return to what it was before civil year

Defense minister sees Syria splitting into separate enclaves representing the main groups active in the fighting.

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia testifies before a House Judiciary Commercial and Administrativ
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Scalia dies at 79

Appointed by Reagan, Scalia was a constitutional originalist considered the leader of the U.S. top court's conservative wing.

00:14 14.02.16 | 0 comments
Avigdor 'Yanush' Ben Gal in 2013

Legendary IDF general Avigdor 'Yanush' Ben-Gal dead at 80

Ben-Gal, credited with playing a key role in Israel's victory over Syria in 1973, was 'one of the few who, by virtue of their actions, shaped the IDF, the armored corps and our combat doctrine,' Defense Minister Ya'alon says.

The scene of a suspected car-ramming attack near Ma'aleh Adumim, February 13, 2016.

4 border policemen wounded in suspected West Bank attack

Earlier, a Palestinian woman shot dead after attempting to stab an Israeli soldier in Hebron.