Clearly you don't understand a fundamental principle - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '57'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '9'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Mark Lincoln
    • 19.05.10 | 03:27 (IDT)

    One 'wins' when one achieves it's goals in a war. One 'loses' when the other side achieves it's goals. In both cases the purpose of the war was to destroy the enemy. In both cases the enemy survived and even prospered as a result of the war. When one side is able to bring to bear the overwhelming amount of firepower and fails totally to achieve it's goals it has lost. In each case Israel lost the Second Lebanon War and Cast Lead. in each case it was the choice of Israel. in BOTH cases the government was waging a war of choice. A war for internal political purposes and not a war for strategic gain. In EACH case the government chose to avoid casualties by refusing to pursue the destruction of the enemy. In BOTH cases the government chose to punish the civilians of Lebanon and Gaza instead of closing with and destroying the enemy. In BOTH cases pictures of immense destruction were to convey to Israelis the idea that victory had been achieved because civilians had been punished. Only those with no sense of reality fell for it. Hamas and Hisbollah are more powerful today than they were at the beginning of operations against them. That is why rational people comprehend that both Hisbollah and Hamas 'won' and Israel, which failed to achieve it's goals, 'lost.' In neither case did Olmert dare to take the casualties necessary to achieve the destruction of the enemy. In both cases the enemy was hardly harmed and was strengthened in it's strategic position. The Second Lebanon War failed to establish deterrence and Cast Lead failed to win the election for Kadima. Not only did they both fail to achieve external strategic goals, they failed to even achieve the political goals which were the motive for pursuing them.

    from the article: A Special Place in Hell / Rebranding Israel as a state headed for fascism
    First published 15:12 18.05.10 | Last updated 15:12 18.05.10
Haaretz Headlines
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu chairs the weekly cabinet meeting in Jerusalem, on January 31, 201

Netanyahu, coalition heads agree to push bill that could suspend Arab MKs

Netanyahu, coalition heads agree to advance bill that could suspend Israeli Arab MKs

Clash on Israel-Lebanon border
With help from UN, Israeli returned from Lebanon after crossing border

The 55-year-old Jerusalem resident was said to be emotionally unstable, and is due to be questioned by security forces.

18:21 07.02.16 | 0 comments
An Israeli soldier is wheeled through a hospital in Ashkelon, Israel, Sunday, Feb. 7, 2016
Sudanese national wounds Israeli soldier in stabbing attack

'This is very serious if it's someone from our community. We roundly condemn it. It's not representative,' says local community head.

16:56 07.02.16 | 0 comments
Dani Dayan speaking at the Israel Democracy Conference, 2015.

'Let's drop the illusion, settler leader Dani Dayan won't serve as envoy to Brazil'

MK Tzachi Hanegbi says Israel shouldn't waste time waiting for Brasilia to accept Dayan's appointment, and instead assign him to a diplomatic position 'in a capital no less important.'