Angry journalists, who initially boycotted the session, describe subcommittee's claims to be part of a 'witch hunt,' and slam Israel's 'authoritarian' efforts to clamp down on the media.14:27 09.02.16 | 2 comments
(retry) "Accusations are not proof" Hello, even the iranians ADMIT there IS a 2nd plant. Which they are REQUIRED but conveniently FAILED to tell the IAEA until it realises that the US is going to EXPOSE its SECRET. "Read the treaty" And Art III of the NPT states CLEARLY there are NO limits for the IAEA to have ACCESS to NUKE info or activities, etc. And iran is STONEWALLING. For a good reason (see below). "nuclear materials had not been introduced" That's what iran SAYS. Yet in 2003, IAEA found significant POLONIUM and HIGHLY ENRICHED URANIUM traces at Natanz. Since then, iran has NEVER been given a CLEAN BILL by the IAEA, as even its LATEST August report CLEARLY indicates. And NOW here is the SECRET second NUKE plant. There is a PATTERN of DECEIT and getting CAUGHT here.