he constantly post nonsense as he ever quotes aspecific law and jurisdiction which supports his crazy assertions . he does not understand the difference between de jure and de facto and often quotes de facto which has no supporting treaty or law to support it ! it is doubtful whether the oslo accord for example is de jure as israel had no authority to change the terms of san remo or the 1922 mandate ! as a de facto agreement it cannot be enforced in any applicable law ! despite binding international armistice agreements of 1949 cj constantly refers to palestinian territory which does not exist and never existed !
Hello user Logout | profile
You have watched of 10 articles
British defense minister would like to have a vote for military action in Syria this week (Reuters)
from the article: Labor expects new settlement freeze as payoff for loyalty oath