I wrote: "Jordan siezed the West Bank in 48 and had no right to it" CJ wrote: "how come in the armistice AGREEment, Israel AGREED to Jordan occupying the West Bank?" An armistice agreement does not imply that Israel agreed to the LEGITIMACY of occupation, just to its existence. An armistice agreement is similar to a ceasefire agreement. CJ wrote: "Where is the UNSC condemnation of Jordan`s occupation? Where is the UNSC condemnation of Jordan`s temporary annexation as trustee? Why doesn't the UNSC condemn slavery in Saudi Arabia? (See http://specialguests.com/guests/viewnews.cgi?id=EEyukEyAkuLVVMYSfk&style=Full%20Article) The UN has always been pro-Arab and anti-Israel.
Hello user Logout | profile
You have watched of 10 articles
U.S., allies stage 20 strikes against Islamic State in Iraq (Reuters)
from the article: Jordan demands return of Dead Sea Scrolls 'seized' by Israel
Israeli Labor Party convention demonstrates deception of highest order
Nearly every delegate at the Tel Aviv conference is happy to declare their belief in the two-state solution, and to explain why it's not yet possible.18:45 11.02.16 | 0 comments