If you want detail, don't look for it in a newspaper. Many of the scholarly papers on the subject are available online. Garfinkel has been very sloppy excavating the site and has a history of jumping to conclusions. It is possible his interpretation is right, but extremely unlikely. Archaeologists who dig with "a spade in one hand and a Bible in the other" do bad science. Unfortunately that sort of bad science has become very common in Israel, because the nationalists use archaeology politically.
Palestinian reportedly shot dead by Israeli soldiers after approaching Gaza border fence (Haaretz)
from the article: Crying King David: Are the ruins found in Israel really his palace?