I find the use of the term censorship to be once again a mangling of the language, and this mangling has been brought to us from an author! But this article did make me wonder. First of all, why did Haaretz not print the sexually explicit language, is this censorship, is it not important to the telling of this censorship tale. We all know that if any of us were to use sexually explicit language in any of our posts, the post would never see the light of day. Thus we have a quandry. Is is alright for Haaretz to censor sexual language, while the schools should be free to use whatever language they choose? I for one do not want nor need the state school system teaching my son or daughter about sex. I feel that it is better that they discuss it with their parents, or learn it in the streets. We do not need state sanctioned sex.
Four Libyan soldiers said killed in battle with Islamists in Benghazi (Reuters)
from the article: Israeli author: Censorship turning Israel into mini-Iran