Haaretz wrote: "It was a retaining wall of the compound where the biblical Temples stood 20 centuries ago." Why does Haaretz parrot the zionist narrative, as if it were fact? We, progressive Haaretz readers, are disappointed by such a one-sided tone, that ignores the new parallel reality, parallel ethics and new parallel history that we have so carefully built, much of it with Haaretz support.
Indonesia government aims to outlaw insulting president, sparks uproar (Reuters)
from the article: Palestinians drop claim that Western Wall is 'not Jewish'