bonds and U.S. support - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Paul Freedman
    • 12.04.05 | 01:52 (IDT)

    I think it would be very interesting if the U.S. stopped it's financial support of Israel. I assume that Israel could find ways to pay the interest on the loans accumulated as it helped the U.S. military-industrial complex by buying U.S. weapons and killing Israeli development of potential avionic competition. Then, the sugardaddy's plums withheld, Israel could take a look at its vulture capitalism and sort out the conflicting claims of economic viability, need to work for peace, and the need to resist Palestinian violence efficiently and without unnecessary strategic concessions for political reasons, After all, the money is now all Israeli--it just may not pay to relocate Jews from Gaza while the Abu's are unable to either suppress the militias or find a stable way, any way, to control them politically aside from endless jockeying ending in the inevitable cease-fire collapse. Before Sharon decided on a fancy-shmancy geopolitical strategy of really bringing Israeli occupiers to the enemy (and Barak hit on the strategy of taking them back)--the 70's saw an attempt at a stategy of gently coercing the Palestinians to go in the opposite direction of where the Israeliis were. It's much easier--and hey, without U.S. apron strings ...

    from the article: If Bush is really serious
    First published 00:00 10.04.05 | Last updated 00:00 10.04.05
Haaretz Headlines
Masked Jewish settlers clash with Palestinians in the West Bank, Sept. 20, 2011.

Cabinet: Jewish 'terrorists' to be held without trial

Administrative detentions will be used 'in the appropriate cases' and will require the approval of Attorney General Yehuda Weinstein.

The stabbing in the Gay Pride parade Thursday, July 30, 2015, and Shira Banki

Teen stabbed in J'lem pride parade succumbs to wounds

16-year-old Shira Banki was critically wounded in an attack by an ultra-Orthodox man on Thursday; Netanyahu: She died for bravely supporting everyone's right to live in dignity.

Geneva

Israel must accept U.S.-Iran entente or risk isolation

If Israel shows greater flexibility, it can still influence the post-nuclear deal agenda ; If Israel digs in its heels, it will increasingly become a liability rather than a strategic asset to the U.S.

Roger Waters and Gideon Levy at the singer's home in the Hamptons.

Roger Waters: I hate apartheid, not Israel

Special interview | The former Pink Floyd singer talks to Gideon Levy about his political views, tragic family history – and when the rock star-turned-activist will be happy to play in Israel again.