The so-called "facts" you list in your comment are completely irrelevant to whether or not she was sexually assaulted. Are you saying that women who are divorced can be raped and their rapists can go free? Are you saying that if a woman contests a will and loses in court, she can be raped and the rapist can go free? Are you saying that strong women who assert themselves can be raped and their rapist can go free? The only question is whether the accused sexually assaulted her or not. Period.
Law expanding definition of terrorist activity passes first Knesset reading (Haaretz)