Chemi Shalev: "As far as Beinart is concerned, it is Netanyahu who is leading the Jewish people astray by misinterpreting historical precedents and misapplying them to the present. It is Netanyahu who has converted the American Israel Public Affairs Committee lobbying organization, and recruited Christian Evangelicals to support his right-wing anti-liberal agendas. It is Netanyahu, aided and abetted by these very same American supporters, who has derailed President Barack Obama’s Middle East peace policies, a move that could go down as a “historical tragedy,” Beinart asserts." How does this differ from the positions taken in Haaretz editorials? Which means that either a) Haaretz is also "archliberal" or b) Beinart isn't.
First refugees travelling on Hungarian bus arrive at Austrian border (Reuters)
from the article: Is archliberal Peter Beinart good for the Jews?