You say you did not declare there would be no truthful discussions. However, you said the Holocaust,however, was a historical event, and, consequently, the expectation exists that an academic conference about it would include truthful discussions and verifiable proclimations. This clearly implies that there would be no truthful discussions. Absent knowledge that there could be no truthful discussions, prior restraint is unsupportable. Why, then, ban the conference? By the way, I would appreciate your thoughts on my comments on the figure six million.
Hello user Logout | profile
You have watched of 10 articles
Preliminary report: Shooting attack in East Jerusalem's Damascus Gate (Haaretz)
from the article: U.S. Jews block conference set to include anti-Israel professors