arm-chair legal experts? - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '7'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '52'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Gilad
    • 13.06.10 | 14:01 (IDT)

    There are very few precedents on which to judge the settlement issue. The reality is that the part you highlight states that the power shall not transfer parts of it's own population in to territories, it does not state that people cannot move on their own accord. As you are aware even a basic house-sale agreement is subject to several pages of legal statements and to countless previous precedents, so surely you will recognise that settlements are not determined by one NOT CLEAR statement. There is a massive difference between for example China's policies on populations in Tibet and Israel's policy where people have often moved and only later were recognised by law (hardly the government 'transfering' people). Even the simplest of legal cases are based on varying competing interpretations of great scaths of law. I hope you don't think that by throwing out one out of context statement you can convince us that international law is so simple and straightforward, devoid of precedents, devoid of context, devoid of legal definitions of legal definitions.

    from the article: Israel’s Greatest Loss: Its Moral Imagination
    First published 14:02 11.06.10 | Last updated 14:02 11.06.10
Haaretz Headlines
quasar black hole Einstein
100 years later, Einstein was right: Gravitational waves detected in scientific milestone

The scientific milestone, which confirms the physicist's century-old theories, opens a new window for studying the cosmos.

17:34 11.02.16 | 0 comments
Ya'alon

Ya'alon: No Israel-Turkey reconciliation if Hamas' Istanbul command post isn't closed

Israeli defense minister calls Turkish government continued hosting of Hamas command post in Istanbul unacceptable after meeting with Swiss defense minister in Bern.

Police in Jerusalem arrest right-wing activist Yehuda Etzion, a former Jewish Underground member
Israel was soft on Jewish terrorists in the 1980s - will history repeat itself?

The Jewish extremists of Israel’s past were quickly welcomed back into society as journalists, political activists and settler leaders. But experts say today’s offenders will not enjoy similar leniency.

18:41 11.02.16 | 0 comments
Kodrashova

Russian aunt who raised orphans to get Israeli residency after all

Following Haaretz report, Interior Ministry changes attitude toward woman who dropped everything to raise her orphaned nephews in Israel in 2002.