It is incorrect to label Israeli treatment of Palestinians in the territories as a holocaust or genocide. However, it is not off base to label it as apartheid. You don't have to show that it is the same in every respect as South African apartheid, to call it such. In both cases, there is a policy of favoring one class of people over another. In South Africa, the government classified blacks as citizens of phony homelands, recognized by no other country, as a justification for denying them political and civil rights in South Africa. Israel has carved out separated enclaves in 40% of the West Bank in which the PA has nominal civil authority, and claims this gives them the moral justification to treat its own (Jewish) citizens as a privileged minority in the other 60%.) Many Israelis recognize that if the situation prevailing in the West Bank were to be made permanent, it would undermine Israel's claims to be a democratic state. But whether permanent or indefinite it is still apartheid.
Jerusalem stabbing: One cop seriously wounded, two others suffer moderate wounds (Haaretz)
from the article: Universities across the globe mark Israeli Apartheid Week