allang 'backing down' - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • ibsen
    • 30.12.09 | 13:18 (IST)

    "I`m not naive enough to think the Iranians will back-down thru negotiations... that`s simply not their character." a There is something to be said for trying to offer Iran something more tangible than threats and a fait-acomplit if they are to 'back down' as you crudely put it. In the recent offer (rejected by Iran)they were expected to hand over all their LEU and receive back on some unspecified date 20% HEU, hardly an offer Iran would be likely to accept unless they were truly 'naive', knowing full well they would quite likely never see the Uranium again(even today Natanz is delayed indefinitely by Russian delays). Their counter offer was to exchange LEU for HEU on Iranian territory simultaneously. So ensuring that Iran would not engage in any further enrichment, whilst ensuring Iran that she would not be at the mercy of Russia and France (and the US of course) who may decide Iran has to wait a little longer than expected for her HEU. Now if there was ever any real intention of a negotiated settlement, the US would not have responded with a hand wave informing Iran that their original offer was non negotiable and not open for discussion. As for your contention about Iranian character, please remember that it was Iran who in 2003 made great efforts to open negotiations with America on nuclear issues as well as Lebanese and Hamas issues. It was however not in the American character to accept such overtures from Iran.

    from the article: Israel can't launch strike against Iran on its own
    First published 03:26 30.12.09 | Last updated 10:15 30.12.09
Haaretz Headlines
Jewish settlers

'Jewish terrorists seeking to overthrow government'

Assailants have more ambitious aims than in the past, such as destabilizing the country and establishing a new regime to be based on Jewish law.

PA forces in Jenin

Jewish terror attacks highlight PA's weakness

During the first intifada, settlers didn't dare enter the village of Duma, the site of last weekend's deadly arson attack. But for two decades the locals have been unprotected.

A partial view of Israel's Dimona nuclear power plant in the southern Negev desert.

Israel aims to thwart bid to monitor nuclear program

Non-binding resolution could cause Israel great diplomatic damage, focus international attention on Israel’s nuclear program and prompt further IAEA action.

A memorial service held for Shira Banki in Tel Aviv, August 2, 2015.

Israel's LGBT community's is reliving its trauma

A feeling of internal grievance has thus been added to the post-traumatic stress everyone is experiencing. And in such a situation, much of the anger and trauma are directed inward.